The quiet role of mind mapping—how a mind mapping coach uses mind mapping to navigate complexity

Some tools arrive as solutions. Others quietly become part of how a person works.

For Dr Subra Mukherjee, mind mapping belongs to the second kind. It didn’t change what she worked on, but it shaped how she helps people think through complexity in consulting sessions, training workshops, and long-term learning programs.

When notes failed to support thinking

For many years, Subra’s notes were always messy.

Linear note-taking never really made sense to her. Ideas didn’t arrive in neat sequences. They branched, overlapped, and connected across topics. At school, she had no language for this mismatch. Notes were written down, but rarely became something she could think with. They were even less useful when she needed to explain her thinking to others.

She first encountered mind mapping during her Master’s studies and used it mainly to take notes and organize literature reviews. The fit felt immediate. Not because it was impressive, but because it followed association rather than sequence and matched how her mind naturally moved.

When thinking became part of her work with others

Curiosity followed. Subra began experimenting with mind mapping beyond academic tasks. Gradually, it entered different parts of her work:

• exploring ideas, plans, and open questions

• preparing teaching and training sessions

• shaping early consulting engagements

By around 2015, she was juggling multiple roles. She was a university educator, a researcher, a supervisor, and someone increasingly working with other people’s thinking. Projects multiplied, and expectations for clarity and direction grew. Hand-drawn maps began to feel limiting.

There was simply too much thinking, both hers and her clients’, to hold on paper.

What she needed was no longer just a way to record thoughts. She needed a digital space that could hold complex conversations as they unfolded.

Finding a way to hold complex thinking

Subra tried several digital tools. Xmind stayed for a simple reason. It allowed thinking to exist before asking it to organize.

Her early maps were practical and unpolished. They included:

• research topics and literature reviews

• book chapters and writing structures

• lesson plans and curriculum designs

• workshop outlines and client session notes

• everyday planning, such as travel or groceries

What surprised her was the relief that came from externalizing complexity, especially in work that involved multiple perspectives.

Xmind supported her thinking in quiet ways:

• branches introduced hierarchy when conversations became scattered

• colors grouped meaning without lengthy explanation

• unfinished ideas could remain unfinished

• collapsing sections made focus possible without losing context

This was not about optimization. It was about reducing mental noise.

How shared clarity became part of her consulting work

The first visible shift appeared in her training and consulting work.

Session preparation moved away from rehearsing content and toward structuring understanding. During workshops, mind maps became a shared surface. Questions, assumptions, and blind spots could be made visible in real time. What clients often described as clarity was not polished answers, but a clearer view of how ideas related to one another.

As her work grew to include larger projects, Xmind remained central:

• designing courses and long-term learning programs

• shaping arguments for writing and research

• testing structure without committing too early

• supporting clients through decisions and transitions

The work did not become simpler, but it became easier to navigate, especially in situations where thinking needed to be shared.

Today, mind mapping runs quietly through Subra’s consulting practice. She uses it to design training programs, facilitate workshops, outline books and courses, and structure client journeys. These tasks are not connected by topic. They are connected by the need to make thinking visible.

Xmind didn’t simplify her work. It made complexity navigable. And for a consultant who works with ideas, that has made all the difference.

Explore more templates for consultants

BCG Matrix Maybelline New York

Six Sigma Process Map

SWOT Analysis Diagrams